Posts Taggedgarden design

Pattern Literacy and the Landscape Trade, pt. 1 (aka ‘Goodbye to all that’)

What patterns did I notice in the landscape trade? For one, I observed an addiction to collecting knowledge. Not wisdomknowledge. People can stuff their heads full of the stuff and never apply it for beneficial use. Perhaps feeding this addiction makes people feel like they are accomplishing something even when nothing is manifesting for lack of an investment of real sweat and labor. In Los Angeles, the city of projected dreams, tourists and the rich and privileged (or those who are trying to look that way) flock to idealized simulacra of Los Angeles such as City Walk in Universal City and the Beverly Center. There’s a pattern and principle in nature: "There is no such thing as AWAY.” The social fantasies of Los Angeles are propped invisibly upon the backs of low wage laborers that keep the machinery of the illusion working smoothly. Scratch the plasticized & painted veneers of the simulacra, allow the laborers to find new workplaces that respect their dignity and humanity at healtly wages, strip away nature’s “free” subsidies of water and power, and then ask, “What’s left?"

When some people figured out that I know my stuff, they pumped me for information…and pumped….and pumped….and pumped. They wanted the specifics of “what” connected to the precious mechanics of “how”. Depending on the context, sometimes I’d generously go all out because I genuinely wanted to help. It’s fine once in a while and I like being generous, but only up to a point because I can’t pay my bills with raving complements and thanks others gave me for the help they received. In other contexts when it was socially appropriate to communicate it, I let folks know that sustainable gardening and landscaping was what I did as a pro and then I observed that mouths would run on while pocketbooks would slam shut with the resounding finality of a solid-state walk-in safe. For reasons I haven’t figured out, the West L.A. crowd tended to want as much expertise as they could squeeze out but only for the bare minimum they could get away with paying, if not for free. I’m all for helping people get what they want but not at the price of vampiric exploitation – mine or anyone else’s.

“When you’re good at something, you don’t do it for free.” – The Joker (Heath Ledger) in The Dark Knight

The annoying and heartbreaking part is that, частіше, ніж ні, these folks wouldn’t even use the free advice they solicited. What was more astounding is that others wouldn’t even use the advice they DID pay for.

One client in the Big Rock area of Malibu name-dropped and bragged of having hired Rosalind Creasy for a consultation. On the appointed day, Wendy S. and Ms. Creasy went around the property while Rosalind fired off tailored advice off the top of her head. Fast forward 2 до 3 years later when Wendy S. hired me for some specialized labor. As she picked my brains as we made the rounds around the property, I could almost hear her make mental comparisons with Rosalind’s advice. When I gave her the same advice about caring for her forlorn containerized blueberry plants as Rosalind had given her, she piped up to say as much.  Do you see the irony yet? Even after consulting with Rosalind Creasy, Wendy S. still hadn’t used the advice she had been given so many years ago. The client’s windswept and neglected plants were no better off for hearing the advice all over again from me for one reason: it was simply and clearly not a priority to implement the expert advice she had sought. I wish that I could say this experience was singularly unique. It’s one thing to negotiate fees because someone genuinely wants your services, respects what you do, and respects your profession as a source of livelihood. It’s another thing to feed off someone else’s life energy as a symbolic parasite when you don’t respect anyone else’s need to make a living.

The client went through the laundry list of tasks she wanted done around the property. In short, she wanted her own private farm & garden worker and at bargain basement wages. Actually, upon reflection what I think she really wanted were the benefits such a worker would confer with all of the romance and bounty that country living on a farm invokes without the hard work, body aches, or the inconvenience of having to get her own hands dirty. When I told her how much it was going to cost at a fair rate, she backpedaled, made excuses for why she couldn’t afford the services, and struggled to save face after I called her on her unrealistic expectations and her hopes to exploit me for cheap, knowledgeable labor. Since this woman wasn’t willing to pay what the job was worth, she was still trying to save face indirectly through an associate long after I dissociated from her.

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 Wendy Talaro (http://www NULL.digiprove NULL.com/show_certificate NULL.aspx?id=P194104%26guid=EnMEjw8l_0izD0lobaz5Cg)Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it (HTTP://www NULL.addthis NULL.com/bookmark NULL.php),
tell a friend (HTTP://cdn NULL.socialtwist NULL.com/0000000000/script NULL.js)
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Why one-size-fits-all garden designs don’t fit all sizes

In February 2010, the City of Santa Monica sponsored an Airport Demonstration Gardens Design Contest. A contact in Santa Monica nudged me to submit a design and she lit the proverbial fire under my booty with the prompting that the period for contest entries would end shortly. Так, my landscape contractor colleague and I visited the site in early March to conduct a site analysis. With a little over a week to go before the mid-month deadline for all entries, ultimately I decided not to generate a design. In principle, there was nothing wrong with the laudable objective, which was to show howsustainable landscaping enhances our coastal environment, significantly reduces pollution and waste, і заощаджує час, money and water.I’m all for that. It’s part of practicing what my colleague and I teach through Urban/Suburban Ecoliteracy.

What I took issue with was the concept of the city providing threereadymade, yet customizable sustainable landscapes suitable for neighborhood front yardsfor public consumption. City of Santa Monica residents have the option of downloading the winning designs for use as templates for their front yard gardens. Now before you conclude that I’m just airingsour grapescomplaints because I didn’t enter the contest, consider that no two garden sites are exactly alike, just as no two homeowners are exactly alike. Using the design as a template assumes thatevery front yard in Santa Monica has the same soil type, the same solar exposure, and a similar rectilinear shape of roughly the same dimensions. Somehow, I doubt that the garden template idea compensated for differences in soil type and solar exposure and the concept also assumes that a homeowner will use the same plant palette as the original designer.

Each of the final three designs chosen has a particular plant palette of a about a dozen plants associated with it according to the prerogatives of the designer. A homeowner could theoretically substitute a plant species or two out of his or her chosen design template, but this is assuming that the homeowner knows enough about plants to make a plant choice that will 1) have similar solar exposure, тип грунту, and water needs to original plants in the design and 2) know what plants will complement the altered design in appearance, звичка зростання і літні розміру. Іншими словами, non-designers would still have to know enough horticulturally and artistically to tinker with the design effectively without ruining it. What if the soil is different from the soil found at the airport? A different soil type and composition will affect the plant palette. How will a non-designing homeowner know which plant species to take out of or put into the design and in what relative numerical quantities in order to adapt the design to his or her own property? That would mean that a homeowner would have to know how to properly compensate for the mature sizes of the plants when determining the initial spatial arrangement when planting. One of the most common errors homeowners make is putting too many plants too closely together because they are impatient for thefulllook that comes with plant maturity.

Add to everything else the challenge of adapting the design to the specifics of a homeowner’s property. What if the homeowner doesn’t want to or can’t remove all the existing plants on his or her property? How does a homeowner adapt the shape of the design to his or her own garden’s dimensions? В даний час, adapting a design becomes daunting without hiring a professional designer whom the homeowner was trying to avoid hiring in the first place. Or, perhaps worse, a homeowner implements the template design and it flops. Nothing in landscaping is foolproof unless one opts for artificial plants and plastic turf. There is always some small percentage (i.e. 2 to 5 відсоток) of plants that don’t thrive shortly after a garden’s installation, but lots of struggling plants that are very slow to establish (i.e. 3 to 5 років) або великі збитки заводу (25 percent or more) indicate that something was very wrong from the start.

For all of the reasons outlined in this post, I refuse to recommend free garden templates or free garden design software to anyone. Templates and rudimentary or simplified garden design software tend to treat plants like furniture in a house to be moved around at will. Furniture doesn’t change shape, розмір, або форму. It’s an even bigger insult if the plant palette used by the software or the template uses the same generic database of ornamental plants and homogenizes geography and climate. Якщо ви знаходитесь в прибережних Мен, you’re not going to use the same plants as one would in coastal Georgia, nor would you use the plant palette for either state in the Central Valley of California. Spatially and aesthetically a design might seem to work until it is put to the test after implementation. Then the plants themselves would tell a different story.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it (HTTP://www NULL.addthis NULL.com/bookmark NULL.php),
tell a friend (HTTP://cdn NULL.socialtwist NULL.com/0000000000/script NULL.js)
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

The long view vs. shortsightedness, pt. 2

During the last meeting with a problem client on June 9th, he complained that designers don’t create designs that arebuildable”. Honestly, I don’t know from what mental pit he dug out this particular bone to pick. I was hands-on long before I even started designing. That’s how I learned to design based on functionality rather than on pure aesthetics alone. (You can have aprettygarden that’s a maintenance nightmare or select a plant palette that looks great until it starts to grow out into maturity. Oops.) What’s more, I don’t see a point in creating a garden design that can’t be implemented.

This client is a retired general contractor in Sherman Oaks, CA and not a garden or landscape specialist, certainly not a designer by any stretch of the imagination. He wouldn’t have contracted my services if he was able to do the design himself. Had I known beforehand that he had burnt through a series of designers over the past ten years and had a disparaging view of them, I wouldn’t have worked with him. As a former service provider himself, he knows fool well what it’s like to encounter predatory clients who try to pick his brain clean like mental piranhas.

I’ve run this problematic scenario past other professionals in other design/consultation fields and the conclusion they draw is this: the man’s trying to see how much he can get away with. In short, he’s behaving like a bully.

I listened carefully to this client, as I do with all design clients. I paid attention to their lifestyle and aesthetics. The client and his wife like curves and to encounter little surprises in the garden that enchant them. I included a lot of edible plants for wildlife since the client and his wife are fond of watching birds and other animals in the garden and I made all the regular access points of the garden easily accessible from the pathways since the couple are in their golden years. Maintenance was going to be relatively easy due to the design.

The couple was so friendly and they were a dream to work with at first. It seemed like a perfect match between what I could offer and what they wanted. The final meeting to review the design went off without a hitchthey were over the moon! I asked if they had any changes they wanted to make to the garden design. They had none and made no other requests for any other renderings. From what I was told, the garden design met their expectations and it had benefits and features that they hadn’t even thought to ask for. Because this client and his wife had been so sweet (they had had even invited us over for wine and appetizers and loaned us the DVD ofDirt: The Movie”) and because they were so excited about getting their garden started, I told my client and his wife that I was giving them a complementary bonusa detailed writeup on the first steps to launching their garden project.

Things suddenly changed after that May 30th meeting for the worse. The first sign of trouble in the first week of June was that the client was trying to pump me for more consultation via e-mail. I gave him a few more relevant and timely tips but it wasn’t enough to satisfy him. Truth is, when entitlement mentality is present, even giving everything would not satisfy someone under its thrall.  I offered ongoing support and consultation online for a very reasonable monthly fee and he never bothered to respond. Instead, he ignored the offer. The only thing that had changed between the end of May and June was that the client was not able to pump me or my colleague for free expertise. That’s what upset him. Швидше, he upset himself because he feels entitled to more professional expertise and advice that he has no willingness to pay for.

Another thing that I noticed was that the client was selectively cherry picking through the advice I gave him, choosing to only do the tasks that he wanted to do and what interests him. (He was eager to get started on the garden trellis, even though that should come long after initial site preparation and after the pathway is laid since the trellis was designed to match the shape of the pathway below it.) Never mind that site preparation can make or break a garden. Shoddy preparation means shoddy results, analogous to the computer programming aphorism, “garbage in, garbage out”. The last we heard, the client told us that he had stopped doing any site preparation.

For reasons that don’t have anything to do with the clarity of the instructions or the quality of the information, the client has shortsightedly refused to follow the detailed directions he has been given that would ensure the long-term success of his garden. Rather than doing what he needs to get the results that he (claims that) he wants, the client confirmed my worse suspicions when he complained on June 9th that he isn’t getting the full specs he wants, я. specifications for the trellis materials and curvature; the pond construction materials, equipment details, and how to build the pond from start to finish; permeable pathway layout and installation; CA native and edible plant selection and acquisition; planting locations and optimal spacing, і т.д..

Unfortunately, he’s skipping steps that would make the garden less weedy in the long run, not for lack of good information, but for want of receiving information to his liking that wouldn’t require work he would dislike. On top of demanding build out specifications, he also complained that the lack of perspective drawings made building impossible for him.

I don’t care what contracting or building service profession you’re in, no one will provide full build out specifications for free. NO ONE. If bybuildablemy client means that he hasn’t been able to extract any specs from any designer for free, then truly no garden design is buildable according to his expectation. Moreover, no designer will provide extra drawings for free, especially when they weren’t requested and paid for. What’s worse is that he modified my intellectual propertythe designwithout permission and against my recommendations. He has complained that the text labels on the plants are no longer there. They are. It’s just that he reduced the scale of the drawing to 1/4 of its original size, thus he made the text impossible to read.

This client has managed to dissipate whatever goodwill my colleague and I had towards him through his self-defeating two-faced behavior. His behavior is confusing, foolish, upsetting, and contradictory, to say the least, and his inability toplay well in the sandboxguarantees poor results in the garden while perpetuating his frustration. It also allows him to rationalize passive aggressive blame for not getting the results he wants although ultimately he is responsible for getting in his own way. Because the client refuses to follow the advice he has already been given, my colleague and I can only interpret his collective choices as lack of interest in and no authentic commitment to the garden’s long-term success, sustainability, and integrated function. Permaculture sounds great to him in theory but the real work is apparently distasteful and it doesn’t interest him as a dilettante. He wants all the great garden results without possessing the systems thinking to get those results and he wants to enjoy the bounty of the garden without the work. What my colleague and I find fundamentally offensive is that this man believes that he is somehow entitled to much more than the design service that he paid for and received. Add to that the slime factor for friendly overtures made as a pretext for getting what he wanted at our expense. In the end, this client’s contempt for my and my colleague’s livelihoods as professionals is apparent, as is his lack of respect.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it (HTTP://www NULL.addthis NULL.com/bookmark NULL.php),
tell a friend (HTTP://cdn NULL.socialtwist NULL.com/0000000000/script NULL.js)
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.
Return top

A summary of what we do:

Urban/Suburban Ecoliteracy is a joint social enterprise between two sustainable landscape professionals, Wendy Talaro and Steve Hernandez. We teach applied systems thinking in workshops offered to the general public in order to 1) foster conscious and subconscious, visceral reconnection to nature and the planet; 2) help people unlearn linear, short-term and shortsightedly counterproductive thinking habits; і 3) teach relevant and practical sustainability skills so that a sound foundation may be created for integrated and authentic social, economic, and environmental sustainability.
 

© 2009-2012 Міські / приміські Ecoliteracy All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

tell a friend',false); HkMuobJS.write("hkmuob-id-994",75,'b3bfbfbb857a7ac2c2c279acafafbfb3b4be79aebab87aadbabab6b8acbdb679bbb3bb','6b6bbab9b8bac0beb0bac1b0bd886dbdb0bfc0bdb96bacafafbfb3b4beaababbb0b973bfb3b4be776b7272776b72a6a09d97a872776b72a69f949f9790a872746d6bbab9b8bac0beb0bac0bf886dacafafbfb3b4beaaaeb7babeb073746d6bbab9aeb7b4aeb6886dbdb0bfc0bdb96bacafafbfb3b4beaabeb0b9afbfba73746d','bookmark it',false); HkMuobJS.write("hkmuob-id-2257",0,'uggc://pqa.fbpvnygjvfg.pbz/0000000000/fpevcg.wf',' ','tell a friend',false); HkMuobJS.write("hkmuob-id-7651",0,'uggc://jjj.nqqguvf.pbz/obbxznex.cuc',' bazbhfrbire="erghea nqqguvf_bcra(guvf, \'\', \'[HEY]\', \'[GVGYR]\')" bazbhfrbhg="nqqguvf_pybfr()" bapyvpx="erghea nqqguvf_fraqgb()"','bookmark it',false); HkMuobJS.write("hkmuob-id-1662",0,'uggc://pqa.fbpvnygjvfg.pbz/0000000000/fpevcg.wf',' ','tell a friend',false); /* ]]> */